Benchmarks & standards

Watts Per Kilogram Chart

Every power-to-weight level from novice to elite — and the exact FTP each one takes at your body weight.

Weight units

Power-to-weight

3.33W/kg

Experienced (3.0–3.5 W/kg) — Consistently trained and comfortably strong on fast group rides, including on rolling terrain.

How to reach 3.5 W/kg →

Watts per kilogram chart by level

The power-to-weight ratios behind each rider level. Most riders sit between two bands rather than neatly inside one.

Cycling power-to-weight levels by watts per kilogram
CategoryW/kg
NoviceUnder 2.0
Recreational2.0–2.5
Intermediate2.5–3.0
Experienced3.0–3.5
Advanced3.5–4.0
Competitive4.0–4.5
Elite amateur4.5–5.0
Elite5.0+

What these numbers are: Coaching-convention orientation bands on a 0.5 W/kg grid, anchored on the widely used power-profile framing in which roughly 4 W/kg marks the gateway to competitive amateur racing and about 5 W/kg the entry to elite. The numeric ranges here are referenced to trained male recreational and amateur cyclists — the population the underlying coaching convention was built around. Female cyclists should not read them as a percentile or reference table: the physiology differs, and we do not publish separate numeric ranges for women because we do not yet have a source we consider solid enough to stand behind. Full methodology and sources.

The FTP you need at every body weight

The number most charts leave out: what a given W/kg target actually costs you in watts. Find your weight down the left, your target across the top.

FTP in watts required to reach each watts-per-kilogram target, by body weight
Weight2.0 W/kgRecreational2.5 W/kgIntermediate3.0 W/kgExperienced3.5 W/kgAdvanced4.0 W/kgCompetitive4.5 W/kgElite amateur5.0 W/kgElite
55 kg121 lb110 W138 W165 W193 W220 W248 W275 W
60 kg132 lb120 W150 W180 W210 W240 W270 W300 W
65 kg143 lb130 W163 W195 W228 W260 W293 W325 W
70 kg154 lb140 W175 W210 W245 W280 W315 W350 W
75 kg165 lb150 W188 W225 W263 W300 W338 W375 W
80 kg176 lb160 W200 W240 W280 W320 W360 W400 W
85 kg187 lb170 W213 W255 W298 W340 W383 W425 W
90 kg198 lb180 W225 W270 W315 W360 W405 W450 W
95 kg209 lb190 W238 W285 W333 W380 W428 W475 W

Read it either way. A 90 kg rider needs 315 W for 3.5 W/kg, while a 65 kg rider needs only 228 W for the same ratio — an 87 W gap for identical power-to-weight. Work out your own figure with the W/kg calculator, or see what each W/kg number actually gets you on the road.

Why the same FTP lands in different bands

Same FTP, very different riders. Weight changes what a number means.

Rider A

2.6 W/kg

FTP
250 W
Weight
95 kg

Strong absolute power, but a heavier frame to carry — intermediate on the climbs, and formidable on the flat.

Rider B

3.6 W/kg

FTP
250 W
Weight
70 kg

Same FTP as Rider A, but a much higher ratio — advanced, and notably faster uphill.

Rider C

4.9 W/kg

FTP
320 W
Weight
65 kg

More power and less weight — elite-amateur power-to-weight on any gradient.

Riders A and B have an identical 250 W FTP, yet Rider B's lower weight puts them two bands higher by power-to-weight. That gap is invisible if you only look at FTP — and it is the whole reason this chart exists.

Why watts per kilogram matters

Watts per kilogram is your power divided by your body weight, and it is the figure cyclists reach for whenever the question involves moving your own mass.

  • Climbing performance. On any gradient, gravity is the main thing you fight, and it scales with weight. W/kg predicts climbing speed far better than raw watts do.
  • Relative fitness. It lets riders of different sizes compare engines on equal terms — a 60 kg and a 90 kg rider can finally be measured against the same scale.
  • Where raw watts still win. On the flat, in a time trial, or driving a paceline into a headwind, absolute power is what moves you. That is why a heavier rider with a big FTP is often the one you want on the front. FTP vs W/kg explains why gravity and air resistance pull in different directions here.

Because the ratio has both a numerator and a denominator, there are two ways to raise it — and for most amateurs one is clearly better. How to improve your W/kg covers both levers, realistic timelines, and which one to pull at your level. For the age dimension, see W/kg by age.

Frequently asked questions

What FTP do I need for 3 W/kg?
Multiply 3 by your body weight in kilograms. A 65 kg rider needs 195 W, a 75 kg rider needs 225 W, and a 90 kg rider needs 270 W. That is why two riders quoting the same FTP can sit a level apart — the heavier rider needs substantially more power for the same ratio.
What FTP do I need for 4 W/kg?
A 65 kg rider needs 260 W, a 75 kg rider needs 300 W, an 85 kg rider needs 340 W, and a 95 kg rider needs 380 W. Four W/kg is the conventional gateway to competitive amateur racing, and the table on this page has the figure for every common body weight.
How do I convert FTP to W/kg?
Divide your FTP in watts by your body weight in kilograms. A 250 W FTP at 75 kg is 250 ÷ 75 = 3.3 W/kg. If you weigh yourself in pounds, divide the pounds by 2.2046 first. The W/kg calculator does both steps for you.
Is 5 W/kg elite?
Five W/kg sits at the entry to elite-level power-to-weight and is well beyond most amateurs. Domestic-elite and professional riders sustain figures around and above this. It is not a realistic target for the majority of riders, and there is nothing wrong with that.
How much can W/kg improve?
It depends on your starting point. Newer riders can make large gains by raising FTP through consistent training, sometimes 0.5–1.0 W/kg over a season. Trained riders improve far more slowly — a rider at 3.5 W/kg may spend a year or more reaching 4.0. Losing excess body weight also raises the ratio, but it should be gradual rather than aggressive.

SmarterTraining automatically adjusts workouts as your fitness improves — so your power-to-weight keeps climbing the sustainable way.

Download on theApp StoreFree workouts · 7-day free trial of adaptive coaching · Live on iOS